Illinois tried to stop interchange on tax and tips. It is not in force.
No other state has a live statute aimed at the part of a card transaction that a merchant collects on someone else's behalf. Illinois does. The Interchange Fee Prohibition Act, 815 ILCS 151/, enacted as Article 150 of Public Act 103-592, says at section 150-10 that an issuer, a payment card network, an acquirer bank or a processor may not receive or charge a merchant any interchange fee on the tax amount or gratuity of an electronic payment transaction — provided the merchant informs the acquirer bank or its designee of the tax or gratuity amount as part of the authorisation or settlement process.
The statute anticipates that most merchants will not be transmitting that data on day one. Section 150-10(b) gives a merchant who does not transmit it up to 180 days after the transaction to submit tax documentation to the acquirer bank, after which the issuer has 30 days to credit back the interchange charged on the tax or gratuity portion. Section 150-10(d) makes it unlawful to raise the rate on the non-tax portion to claw the difference back. On paper, it is a well-constructed rule.
It is not in force, and a Chicago merchant should not plan as though it will be. The Illinois Compiled Statutes note against section 150-10 currently reads: source Public Act 103-592, effective 7-1-27, see Section 70 of Public Act 104-532 for the effective date of Article 150. That is the second postponement — the effective date moved to 1 July 2026 and then to 1 July 2027. Running alongside that, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has permanently enjoined the core interchange restriction as applied to national banks, federal savings associations, out-of-state state banks and the payment card networks, after the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency acted in April 2026 to expand national banks' authority to receive non-interest fees indirectly through intermediaries including card networks.
What that actually means for your account
The injunction does not reach Illinois-chartered banks and state credit unions. So even on the most optimistic reading, what survives to 2027 is a rule covering a narrow slice of issuers rather than the networks and national banks that carry the overwhelming majority of card volume presented in Chicago. The honest planning assumption is that you pay interchange on the tax and the tip today, you will keep paying it, and any quote that prices in an Illinois interchange saving is pricing in something that does not exist.
That is worth saying plainly because the opposite has been sold in this market. If a processor or agent has told you they can pass through an Illinois tax-and-tip interchange benefit, ask them which issuers it applies to and which court order they are relying on. The statute's own effective-date note is a public document and takes one minute to check.
The reason it matters commercially is the interaction with the next section. Chicago has one of the highest combined sales tax rates of any large American city, and a tipping culture in hospitality, which is precisely why the Illinois legislature went after this and precisely why the arithmetic is larger here than elsewhere.